Anthropologie Structurale [C Levi-Strauss] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This reissue of a classic will reintroduce readers to Lévi-Strauss’s understanding of man and society in terms of individuals—kinship, social organization, religion. Get this from a library! Anthropologie structurale.. [Claude Lévi-Strauss].
|Published (Last):||22 October 2014|
|PDF File Size:||6.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.51 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The “Leiden” perspective drove research for many decades, influencing successive generations of anthropologists.
Anthropologie structurale deux
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Prescribing exogamy creates a distinction between marriageable and tabooed women that necessitates a search for women outside one’s own kin group “marry out or die out” and fosters exchange relationships with other groups.
Only those who practice structural analysis are aware of what they are actually trying to do: Others, for example Godelier, critiqued structuralism’s synchronic approach that led it to be essentially ahistorical. Just as speakers can talk without awareness of grammar, he argued, humans are unaware of the workings of social structures in anthropolkgie life.
In his most popular work, The Raw and the Cookedhe described folk tales of tribal South America as related to one another through a series of transformations—as one opposite in tales here changed into its opposite in tales there.
Articles that may contain original research from March All articles that may contain original research Articles needing additional references from March All articles needing additional references Articles with multiple maintenance issues. Culture, he claimed, has to take into anthropoolgie both life and death and needs to have a way of mediating between the two.
Structural anthropology – Wikipedia
The second form of exchange within elementary structures is called generalised exchange, meaning that a man can only marry either his MBD matrilateral cross-cousin marriage or his FZD patrilateral cross-cousin marriage.
Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. The most recent chairs structura,e held by J. March Learn how and when to remove this template message. Mauss argued that gifts are not free, but rather oblige the recipient to reciprocate. The risk created by such a delayed return is obviously lowest in restricted exchange systems. The marriage system was quite messy and the chance of it breaking down increased with the number of groups involved.
Saussure argued that linguists needed to move beyond the recording of parole individual speech acts and come to an understanding of languethe grammar of each language. Matrilateral cross-cousin marriage arrangements where the marriage of the parents is repeated by successive generations are very common in parts of Asia e.
Another concept was borrowed from the Prague school of linguisticswhich employed so-called binary oppositions in their research. Marxists shifted the attention within anthropology from an almost exclusive preoccupation with kinship to an emphasis on economic issues.
Actor—network theory Alliance theory Cross-cultural studies Cultural materialism Culture theory Diffusionism Feminism Historical particularism Boasian anthropology Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems theory.
Exogamy promotes inter-group alliances and forms structures of social networks. While structural-functionalists looked for structures within social organisation, structuralism seeks to identify links between structures of thought and social structures. From a structural perspective matrilateral cross-cousin marriage is superior to its patrilateral counterpart; the latter has less potential to produce social cohesion since its exchange cycles are shorter the direction of wife exchange is reversed in each successive generation.
Leach was more concerned with researching people’s actual lives than with the discovery of universal mental structures. The Yanomami fit very well into the alliance theory mold, while the Tallensi or Azande do not. Kuper allowed that exchange was the universal form of marriage, but there could be other significant factors.
Also, social cohesion through reciprocity does not have atructurale rest primarily on the bride exchange. Views Read Edit View history. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. It is a “total prestation” as Mauss called it, as it carries the power to create a system of reciprocity in which the honour of both giver and recipient are engaged.
This article needs additional citations wtrauss verification. In reality, the system was strongly unbalanced with built-in status differences between wife-givers and wife-takers. This type of anthropology, developed by late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century scholars, was eventually called “de Leidse Richting,” or “de Leidse School,”. Archaeological Biological Cultural Linguistic Social.
Key theories Actor—network theory Alliance theory Cross-cultural studies Cultural materialism Culture theory Diffusionism Feminism Historical particularism Boasian anthropology Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems theory. Gift exchanges, therefore play a crucial role in creating and maintaining social relationships by establishing bonds of obligations.
Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Bibliography Journals List of indigenous peoples Organizations. While part of his analysis of the Kachin was simply based on incorrect ethnographic information, structura,e rest reflected Kachin ideology but not actual practice. He thought that in practice there would be competition for women, leading to accumulation and therefore asymmetries in the system. According to Leach, in Kachin reality instabilities arose primarily from competition for bridewealth.
Internal incoherence and a range of intrinsic limitations further reduced its appeal.
structuarle Much earlier, and some miles north of Paris, stdauss specific type of applied anthropology emerged at Leiden UniversityNetherlands that focused frequently on the relationship between apparent cultural phenomena found in the Indonesian archipelago: Structuralism’s main propositions were not formulated in a way so that they could be subject to verification or falsification. He showed, for example, how opposing ideas would fight and were resolved to establish the rules of marriagemythology and ritual.
Anthropologie structurale – Claude Lévi-Strauss – Google Books
Roman Jakobson and others analysed sounds based on the presence or absence of certain features, such as “voiceless” vs. Retrieved from ” https: Through the gift, the givers give part of themselves, imbuing the gift a certain power that compels a response. He showed too that the ways people initially categorized animals, treesand other natural features, were based on a series of oppositions.
For them, social structures were primarily shaped by material conditions, property relations and class struggles. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. Social relationships are therefore based on exchange; Durkheimian solidarity, according to Mauss, is best achieved through structures of reciprocity and related systems of exchange. For example, as the title implies, raw becomes its opposite cooked.